According to the statistics, there were 14193 transnational marriages registered in 1982, and 50773 covering 53 countries and regions in 1997, which is on rise year by year. With the number of transnational marriage mounting, the controversy has become more and more heated.

For: everyone has his right to pursue a better life. This is the narrow restriction of nationality, why not if they can enjoy better life, better welfare and different cultures? The objectors are those "who can't get the sour grapes". Even the marriage of two Chinese may have contradictions and conflict, the key point is how to coordinate.

Against: It is definite that the transnational marriage concerns interest. The foundation of the marriage is wrong and the strikingly different cultural background and customs will lead to contradictions. The household family violence will threaten their life, which is not rare. Therefore, only when you marry a person with the same cultural background and customs can you get happiness.

Neutral: Tolstoy once said "Love makes marriage holy and pure." As long as the marriage is established on love, it doesn't matter whether it is domestic or transnational. The feet know well whether the shoes are fit.

My dear friends, what is your opinion?